April 27th, 2009 by Alex Coté
My last post, posed the question: are predictive models still relevant in today’s economic climate? As expected it generated a fair amount of discussion both on and off the blog. Thank you for all of your comments. Let’s continue the dialogue.
In this market, it’s fair to be skeptical, but abandoning all forms of scoring completely would likely do more harm than good. Having some method of consistently evaluating and rank ordering customers remains the best, most efficient way to manage these relationships for both upfront credit decisioning and ongoing portfolio monitoring and collections activities. However, carefully choosing the type of model and conducting some near-term validation is certainly warranted. Based on discussions with a variety of credit and collections professionals, this market appears to be leaning toward a more point-in-time view of their prospects and current customers such as:
We also heard from credit pros that they are increasing turning to a variety of information sources to get a better picture of how they are getting paid vs. their peers and then reporting this information back to senior management. This “better/worse” than the benchmark analysis can prove quite enlightening for those outside of the day-to-day credit and collections function. This can take many forms:
Trying to rate and analyze large volumes of both prospective and existing customers, scoring is still a must, especially as many companies have cut staff. Below are some helpful resources* that you can use to guide your assessment of the various options on the market today:
*Please note that some of these are available for a fee or subscription service.
What are your thoughts on how scoring should be applied and what types of scoring you are using today?




(No Ratings Yet)© 2010 Cortera, Inc. All rights reserved.
